<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Deploying IPv6</title>
	<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net</link>
	<description>The authors of O' Reilly's IPv6 Network Administration discuss life, networking, and everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>;login: on IPv6</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Usenix&#8217;s April 2008 edition of ;login: magazine has focus on IPv6. Some of the articles (including the one on why it is time to make a move) are freely available already.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2008/04/17/login-on-ipv6/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Googlev6</title>
		<description><![CDATA[At the most recent IETF meeting, there was an IPv6 only hour. The idea was to turn off IPv4 and see what was missing. I think no one was particularly surprised to discover that more work is needed.
One thing that did work was ipv6.google.com - an IPv6-only version of Google&#8217;s search page that Google established [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2008/04/01/googlev6/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>IP Address Markets</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The upcoming advent of IPv4 address exhaustion will mean a number of very interesting and mostly likely painful things about how networks are run in the future. I spoke at RIPE 55 about this; at this point in time it looks like whatever else goes on, IPv4 exhaustion will do more to sell IPv6 than [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/11/22/ip-address-markets/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>ICANN Fact Sheet</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN have released a short IPv6 Factsheet to explain what IPv6 is and why people should be thinking about it.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/10/26/icann-fact-sheet/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>RH0</title>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been rather a lot of talk about RH0, that&#8217;s IPv6&#8217;s type 0 routing header. Broadly speaking, the header allowed you to list a set of places that the packet should go to before its final destination. In the book we commented that source routing

used to be a security hot button in IPv4, when authentication [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/06/03/rh0/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Availability of Sites over IPv6</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems there is an IPv6 deployment metric on which Ireland leads the world! At the most recent RIPE meeting, there was a study of the number of the top 100 most visited web sites (according to Alexa) in each country had support for IPv6 HTTP, SMTP or DNS. The results for Ireland are on [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/05/17/availability-of-sites-over-ipv6/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>April RFCs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Tom Limoncelli and Peter Salus have published a collection of April first RFCs. There&#8217;s a whole chapter on IPv6, and I&#8217;m glad to see that the first chapter is on the evil bit, which was briefly implemented in FreeBSD.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/04/23/april-rfcs/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Save the date</title>
		<description><![CDATA[People sometimes ask me if I think IPv6 will take off in a big way. My answer is that there is no other contender to replace IPv4, and sooner or later we will have to move away from IPv4 as pressure on IPv4 addressing makes things more uncomfortable. One of the big areas of uncertainty [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/02/13/save-the-date/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Will managing an IPv6 network be more cost effective than managing an IPv4 network?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Manweek conferences were held in Dublin last October. As part of the IPOM conference there was a pannel session, on IPv6, asking if managing an IPv6 network can be more cost effective than managing an IPv4 network. The pannelists were Jeroen Massar (of SixXS), David Wilson (of HEAnet), and Niall Murphy. An MP3 of [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/01/13/will-managing-an-ipv6-network-be-more-cost-effective-than-managing-an-ipv4-network/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Address selection</title>
		<description><![CDATA[At one location I have a subnet that has both a SixXS tunnel (with 2001:/16 addresses) and 6to4 connectivity (with 2002::/16 addresses).
Today I was browsing www1.ietf.org, which has a 2610:&#8230; IPv6 address. This is closer to my 6to4 address than my SixXS tunnel address, so my machine selected the 6to4 address as the source address. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.deployingipv6.net/index.php/archives/2007/01/12/address-selection/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
